PARTITION SUIT PLAINT
In the Court of X, District X.
Plaint dated 2 April 2026. Plaintiff: X, X. Defendant 1: X, X. Other defendants: X
- 1. PROPERTY
X; X. Regime: Punjab freehold/revenue-record property.
- 2. TITLE AND SHARES
X. Plaintiff share: X. Defendant shares: X.
- 3. POSSESSION
Joint possession.
- 4. CAUSE OF ACTION
X. Latest cause: 1 April 2026. Prior demand: X. Demand date: 2 April 2026
- 5. MODE OF PARTITION
Mode: Physical division by metes and bounds. Requested allotment: X. Sale/buy-out position: Physical partition remains primary relief.
- 6. ACCOUNTS
X
- 7. JURISDICTION / COURT FEE
Suit valuation: ₹25,000 (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only). Court-fee basis: X.
- 8. PRIOR CASES
Earlier partition proceeding absent from the disclosed record.
- 9. DOCUMENTS
X.
- 10. RELIEFS
Declaration: X. Partition: X. Injunction: X Accounts: X Costs/further relief: X Interim protection: Status quo against transfer/construction.
VERIFICATION
Verified at X on 3 April 2026 that facts stated from my knowledge and records are true and legal submissions are based on advice.
LEGAL BASIS
Punjab: Order XX Rule 18 CPC governs partition decrees; section 54 CPC routes partition of an estate assessed to Government revenue through the Collector after the civil court declares rights. Sections 2 and 3 of the Partition Act, 1893 permit sale or co-sharer purchase in the stated circumstances. The competent civil court receives the plaint. The exact Punjab court-fee rate and pecuniary threshold were not confirmed; appeal follows the CPC from the decree/order of the trial court.
Chandigarh: The same CPC and Partition Act rules govern the civil suit. For a sector/estate property, the title record is the Estate Office file under the Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 and Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007; do not plead it as jamabandi property. The exact Chandigarh court-fee rate and pecuniary threshold were not confirmed; appeal follows the CPC. Rule 16 of the Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and Rule 14 of the Chandigarh (Sale of Sites and Buildings) Rules, 1960 both forbid fragmentation of a site or building, and the Supreme Court held on 10 January 2023, in Residents Welfare Association v. Union Territory of Chandigarh, that a residential unit in Phase-I may not be fragmented, divided, bifurcated or apartmentalised. Check the Estate Office position before dividing a sector site or building by metes and bounds.
PERSONAL DATA NOTICE
This notice is given under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023.
The purpose of collecting personal data in this partition plaint is to identify every necessary party, establish the co-ownership title and shares, and present the partition relief to the competent civil court.
The record will be held by Kagaznama and may be shared with the parties, court, advocate, court commissioner, Collector/revenue officer where section 54 applies, and the relevant Estate/development authority.